Evaluation Of Jepara Regency Regulation Number 2 Of 2014 On The Existence Of Jepara Furniture Development In The 2021 Covid-19 Pandemic

Authors

  • Niswa Adlina Labiba Diponegoro University
  • Teguh Yuwono Diponegoro University
  • Rina Martini Diponegoro University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32528/politico.v23i1.328

Keywords:

Evaluation, Regional Regulation, Furniture, Covid-19

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to analyze and evaluate a policy of Jepara Regency Regional Regulation Number 2 of 2014 concerning the Protection, Empowerment, and Development of the Furniture Industry. This study uses a qualitative approach with data collection techniques in the form of interviews through snowball sampling techniques. This study uses William N. Dunn's public policy evaluation theory. The results of the study show that various kinds of problems have arisen, such as a decline in exports due to many destination countries being locked down, the difficulty in finding production workers, the scarcity of wood materials, to the lack of infrastructure and facilities from the government. Through this Regional Regulation, it has not been able to overcome all kinds of problems that occur optimally. Moreover, from the 6 indicators of policy evaluation according to William N. Dunn, this Regional Regulation can only carry out 2 optimal indicators. This study recommends that the government review the effectiveness of regional regulations. In addition, the government must also establish better cooperation with other actors such as furniture business associations and wood-producing regions to provide reciprocity and maintain the existence of Jepara furniture.

References

Creswell, J. W. (2012). QUALITATIVE INQUIRY & RESEARCH DESIGN : CHOOSING AMONG FIVE APPROACHES. In SAGE Publications,Inc. (Vol. 1, Issue 69).

Dunn, W. N. (2003). Pengantar Analisis Kebijakan Pulblik. In Gadjah Mada Universitas Press. https://www.pdfdrive.com/pengantar-analisis-kebijakan-pulblik-e176089208.html

Fathia, M. (2018). Efektivitas Pasal 23 Ayat 2 Peraturan Daerah Kota Malang Nomor 8 Tahun 2010 Tentang Penyelenggaraan Usaha Perindustrian dan Perdagangan Terkait Jarak Pendirian Minimarket Dengan Pasar Tradisional. Hukum Brawijaya, XIV(1), 116–127.

Ginting, R., & Noor, M. (2015). Kebjakan publik. 1–100. http://eprints.upgris.ac.id/305/1/8. BUKU AJAR KEBIJAKAN PUBLIK.pdf

Murdiyani, M. (2016). PERAN PEMERINTAH KABUPATEN JEPARA DALAM RANGKA FASILITASI TERHADAP INDUSTRI MEBEL DALAM PERDAGANGAN BEBAS (STUDI KASUS BERLANGSUNGNYA ACFTA). Journal of Politic and Government Studies, 5, 248–253.

Pravitasar, F. D. (2018). DAMPAK KEBIJAKAN PERATURAN DAERAH NOMOR 4 TAHUN 2011 TERHADAP PAJAK RESTORAN DAN TINGKAT REALISASI PAJAK RESTORAN DARI TAHUN 2007 SAMPAI 2012. Universitas Negeri Surabaya, 49–56.

Safitri, N. (2015). Evaluasi Kebijakan Peraturan Daerah Nomor 4 Tahun 2011 Terhadap Tingkat Realisasi Pajak Hotel Atas Rumah Kos Dari Tahun 2012 Sampai Tahun 2014 ( Studi Pada Dinas Pendapatan Dan Pengelolaan Keuangan Kota Surabaya ). 1–22.

Salim, Z., & Munadi, E. (2017). INFO KOMODITI FURNITUR. Info Komoditi Furnitur, 1–125.

Santoso, P., & Tapiheru, J. (2010). Analisis Kebijakan Publik. In Kebijakan Publik.

Sofari, A. S. (2014). Peran Pengusaha Mebel Dalam Memengaruhi Proses Pembuatan Peraturan Daerah Kabupaten Jepara Nomor 17 Tahun 2013 Tentang Perlindungan Industri. Politika: Jurnal Ilmu Politik, 5(2). https://ejournal.undip.ac.id/index.php/politika/article/view/8903%0Ahttps://ejournal.undip.ac.id/index.php/politika/article/download/8903/7229

Tafiqurakhman. (2014). Kebijakan Publik. Kebijakan Publik, 1, 152.

Published

2023-03-28

How to Cite

Labiba, N. A., Yuwono, T. ., & Martini, R. (2023). Evaluation Of Jepara Regency Regulation Number 2 Of 2014 On The Existence Of Jepara Furniture Development In The 2021 Covid-19 Pandemic. POLITICO, 23(1), 122–134. https://doi.org/10.32528/politico.v23i1.328