Additional Menu
Electronic Filing and Archiving
Electronic Filing and Archiving Policy
Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi Indonesia maintains a robust electronic filing, digital preservation, and archiving system to guarantee the long-term accessibility, permanence, and security of all published scholarly content. Ensuring secure digital archiving and persistent identification of research papers is a crucial component of maintaining scholarly integrity, supporting permanent public access, and adhering to digital transparency standards established by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) Core Practices.
Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi Indonesia maintains a robust electronic filing, digital preservation, and archiving system to guarantee the long-term accessibility, permanence, and security of all published scholarly content. Ensuring secure digital archiving and persistent identification of research papers is a crucial component of maintaining scholarly integrity, supporting permanent public access, and adhering to digital transparency standards established by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) Core Practices.
1. Digital Preservation and Repository Integration
All published articles, editorial records, and supplementary data are stored in secure electronic databases and independent long-term digital archiving networks (such as LOCKSS, CLOCKSS, or national library repositories) to prevent data loss resulting from technological obsolescence or system failures. Preserving the permanent record of science without unauthorized alteration is essential for academic trust, reflecting best practices in scholarly publishing infrastructure as highlighted in the COPE Guidance and Tools repository.
All published articles, editorial records, and supplementary data are stored in secure electronic databases and independent long-term digital archiving networks (such as LOCKSS, CLOCKSS, or national library repositories) to prevent data loss resulting from technological obsolescence or system failures. Preserving the permanent record of science without unauthorized alteration is essential for academic trust, reflecting best practices in scholarly publishing infrastructure as highlighted in the COPE Guidance and Tools repository.
2. Version Control and Retraction Archiving
In cases where published manuscripts require formal corrections, errata, expressions of concern, or retractions, the electronic filing system ensures that the audit trail remains intact and transparent to readers. Retracted articles or amended versions are clearly marked with digital watermarks and linked directly to public notices to uphold scientific transparency, adhering strictly to the systematic protocols detailed in the COPE Retraction Guidelines.
In cases where published manuscripts require formal corrections, errata, expressions of concern, or retractions, the electronic filing system ensures that the audit trail remains intact and transparent to readers. Retracted articles or amended versions are clearly marked with digital watermarks and linked directly to public notices to uphold scientific transparency, adhering strictly to the systematic protocols detailed in the COPE Retraction Guidelines.
3. Data Security and Editorial Independence in Electronic Records
The journal's electronic filing infrastructure safeguards user data, author manuscripts, and reviewer communications with strict confidentiality and security protocols. Maintaining uncompromised editorial control and data security over digital filing systems protects the editorial independence of the journal against external commercial or technological interference, aligned with principles outlined in the COPE Focus on Editorial Independence and Transparency.
The journal's electronic filing infrastructure safeguards user data, author manuscripts, and reviewer communications with strict confidentiality and security protocols. Maintaining uncompromised editorial control and data security over digital filing systems protects the editorial independence of the journal against external commercial or technological interference, aligned with principles outlined in the COPE Focus on Editorial Independence and Transparency.
