Educational Evaluation: Analyzing The Quality Of Summative Tests At Modern Junior High School Al Rifa Ie Malang

Authors

  • Susilo Hidayah Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang
  • Chalishah Dyah Capriatin Pascasarjana Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang
  • Indah Aminatuz Zuhriyah Pascasarjana Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32528/tarlim.v8i1.2658

Keywords:

Evaluation, Quality, Summative Test

Abstract

This article aims to analyze the quality of even semester final summative questions of PAI subjects in class VIII of Modern Al Rifa Ie Junior High School in Malang in the 2023/2024 academic year. This research is a quantitative descriptive research. The results showed that the quality of question items based on validity, on short description questions there are 13 valid items, true-false questions there are 6 questions, the type of long description questions there are 5 items. The quality of question items based on reliability, on the short description questions the questions used have a high reliability coefficient of 0.798, true-false questions have a high reliability coefficient of 0.609, while the type of long description questions have a low reliability coefficient of 0.560. The quality of questions based on the level of difficulty, in the short description question there is 1 difficult item, 2 medium items, and 17 easy items. In true-false questions and long descriptions, all questions are categorized as easy items. The quality of questions based on differentiating power, in the short description question there are 12 items that have poor differentiating power, 2 items have sufficient differentiating power, 3 items have good differentiating power, and 3 items have excellent differentiating power. For the results of the analysis on true-false questions, there are 6 items that have poor differentiating power, 1 item has sufficient differentiating power, and 3 items have good differentiating power. As for the long description items, there are 2 items that have poor differentiating power, 2 items have sufficient differentiating power, and 1 item has excellent differentiating power.

References

Amrullah. (2018). Analisis Instrumen Tes Soal Pilihan Ganda Ujian Sekolah (US) Mata Pelajaran Al Islam Kelas XII SMA Muhammadiyah se-kota Palembang. Ad-Man-Pend: Jurnal Administrasi Manajemen Pendidikan, 1(1), 11–20. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.32502/amp.v1i1.956

Anwar, B. (2019). Kompetensi Pedagogik sebagai Agen Pembelajaran. Shaut Al Arabiyyah, 6(2), 114–125. https://doi.org/10.24252/saa.v6i2.7129

Arifin, Z. (2014). Evaluasi Pembelajaran. Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.

Arikunto, S. (2011). Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktek. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Arikunto, S. (2018). Dasar-Dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan. Jakarta: PT. Bumi Aksara.

Astuti, N. D., Hapsan, A., Herianto, & Dkk. (2024). Prinsip-Prinsip Pengukuran dan Evaluasi Pendidikan. Sulawesi Selatan: CV. Ruang Tentor.

Ismail, I., & Dkk. (2020). Asesmen dan Evaluasi Pembelajaran. Makasar: Cendekia Publisher.

Huda, H., Nursyamsiyah, S., & Alfan, M. (2022). The Community-based Character Education: Study of the'Imaji Academy'Program in Madrasa. Indonesian Journal of Islamic Education Studies (IJIES), 5(1), 113-127.

Kurniawan, A., Febrianti, A. N., Hardianti, T., & Dkk. (2022). Evaluasi Pembelajaran. Padang: PT. Global Eksklusif Teknologi.

Muluki, A. (2020). Analisis Kualitas Butir Tes Semester Ganjil Mata Pelajaran IPA Kelas IV MI Radhiatul Adawiyah. Jurnal Ilmiah Sekolah Dasar, 4(1), 86–96. https://doi.org/10.23887/jisd.v4i1.23335

Nurdin, R. (2020). Analisis Kualitas Soal Ujian Akhir Semester Mata Pelajaran PAI. Jurnal Pendidikan Aktual, 6(2), 133–144. https://repository.ar-raniry.ac.id/id/eprint/16456

Nurian, F. (2019). Metodologi Penelitian Kuantitatif. Semarang: CV Pilar Nusantara.

Nurlaila, Kustati, M., & Amelia, R. (2023). Analisis Kualitas Butir-Butir Soal Ulangan Harian Pendidikan Agama Islam Dengan Menggunakan Iteman. SOKO GURU: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 3(3), 142–155. https://doi.org/10.55606/sokoguru.v3i3.3069

Pangesti, J. A. (2019). Analisis kualitas butir soal penilaian akhir semester 1 mata pelajaran pendidikan agama islam kelas XII di SMA Negeri 2 Kroya Kabupaten Cilacap. In Institut Agama Islam Negeri Purwokerto.

Rizema, P. S. (2013). Desain Evaluasi Belajar Berbasis Kinerja. Yogyakarta: DIVA Press.

Rukajat, A. (2018). Teknik Evaluasi Pembelajaran. Yogyakarta: Deepublish.

Sax, G. (1980). Principles of Educational and Psychological Measurement and Evaluation (2nd ed.). Phoenix Publishing Services.

Septiani, Y., Aribbe, E., & Diansyah, R. (2020). Analisis Kualitas Layanan Sistem Informasi Akademik Universitas Abdurrab Terhadap Kepuasan Pengguna Menggunakan Metode Sevqual (Studi Kasus : Mahasiswa Universitas Abdurrab Pekanbaru). JURNAL TEKNOLOGI DAN OPEN SOURCE, 3(1), 131–143. https://doi.org/10.36378/jtos.v3i1.560

Sudijono, A. (2003). Pengantar Evaluasi Pendidikan. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo.

Sugiyono. (2017). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan Mixed Methods. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Supriyadi, G. (2011). Pengantar Teknik Evaluasi Pembelajaran. Malang: Intimedia.

Wildan, W. (2017). Pelaksanaa Penilaian Autentik Aspek Pengetahuan, Sikap dan Keterampilan di Sekolah atau Madrasah. Jurnal Tatsqif, 15(2), 131–153. https://doi.org/10.20414/jtq.v15i2.3

Yeni Hartanti. (2021). Pembentukan Karakter melalui Pendidikan Agama Islam. GUAU Jurnal Pendidikan Profesi Guru Agama Islam, 1, 335–342. https://studentjournal.iaincurup.ac.id/index.php/guau/article/view/69

Yusuf, R. (2021). Analisis Kualitas Butir Soal Ujian Nasional Mata Pelajaran Matematika Sekolah Menengah Pertama. Journal of Didactic Mathematics, 1(3), 158–164. https://doi.org/10.34007/jdm.v1i3.417

Downloads

Published

2025-03-04

How to Cite

Hidayah, S., Dyah Capriatin, C., & Aminatuz Zuhriyah, I. (2025). Educational Evaluation: Analyzing The Quality Of Summative Tests At Modern Junior High School Al Rifa Ie Malang. TARLIM : JURNAL PENDIDIKAN AGAMA ISLAM, 8(1), 1 –. https://doi.org/10.32528/tarlim.v8i1.2658