Sinergi Quadruple Helix dalam Penguatan Tata Kelola BUMDes

Studi Kasus Desa Wisata Binor, Kabupaten Probolinggo

Abstract

Pengembangan desa wisata berbasis Badan Usaha Milik Desa (BUMDes) kerap terkendala oleh lemahnya inovasi dan minimnya sinergi antaraktor strategis. Penelitian ini bertujuan mengkaji bagaimana kolaborasi Quadruple Helix memperkuat tata kelola BUMDes dalam pengembangan desa wisata, dengan studi kasus BUMDes Bhinor Energi di Desa Binor, Kabupaten Probolinggo. Penelitian menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif dengan desain studi kasus, melalui wawancara mendalam, observasi partisipatif, dan studi dokumentasi. Temuan utama menunjukkan bahwa BUMDes berperan sebagai simpul sentral yang menghubungkan pemerintah, masyarakat, pelaku usaha, dan akademisi dalam ekosistem kolaboratif yang saling melengkapi: pemerintah sebagai fasilitator kebijakan dan infrastruktur, masyarakat sebagai pelaksana sekaligus penjaga keberlanjutan budaya dan lingkungan, pelaku usaha sebagai mitra melalui Tanggung Jawab Sosial Perusahaan berbasis kemitraan, dan akademisi sebagai pendamping penguatan kapabilitas kelembagaan. Sinergi tersebut memperkuat empat dimensi good governance transparansi, akuntabilitas, partisipasi, dan efektivitas yang didukung oleh mekanisme koordinasi yang diformalisasi melalui regulasi desa. Penelitian ini berkontribusi dengan menawarkan model tata kelola kolaboratif BUMDes yang replikatif dan dapat diadaptasi pada konteks desa wisata lain dengan memperhatikan kondisi lokal.

References

Andrews, M., Pritchett, L., & Woolcock, M. (2017). Building state capability: Evidence, analysis, action. library.oapen.org. https://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/31857

Ansell, C., & Gash, A. (2008). Collaborative governance in theory and practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(4), 543–571. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mum032

Arnstein, S. R. (2019). A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Planning Association, 85(1), 24–34.

Asmuni, Rohim, & Trihartono, A. (2020). Minimizing brain drain: How BumDes holds the best resources in the villages. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 485(1), 0–7. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/485/1/012011

Bovens, M. (2007). Analysing and assessing accountability: A conceptual framework 1. European Law Journal, 13(4), 447–468.

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.

Cahaya, F. R., Porter, S., Tower, G., & Brown, A. (2015). The Indonesian Government’s coercive pressure on labour disclosures: Conflicting interests or government ambivalence? Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 6(4), 475–497. https://doi.org/10.1108/SAMPJ-09-2014-0051

Carayannis, E. G., & Campbell, D. F. J. (2011). Mode 3 knowledge production in quadruple helix innovation systems: Twenty-first-century democracy, innovation, and entrepreneurship for development. In Mode 3 Knowledge Production in Quadruple Helix Innovation Systems: 21st-Century Democracy, Innovation, and Entrepreneurship for Development (pp. 1–63). Springer.

Castellas, E. I., Stubbs, W., & Ambrosini, V. (2019). Responding to Value Pluralism in Hybrid Organizations. Journal of Business Ethics, 159(3), 635–650. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-018-3809-2

Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research designs. Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches.

Defourny, J., & Develtere, P. (2009). The social economy: the worldwide making of a third sector. orbi.uliege.be. https://orbi.uliege.be/bitstream/2268/13613/1/

Devi, S. S., & Rahaju, T. (2025). Pengembangan Desa Wisata Berbasis Pemberdayaan Masyarakat di Desa Wisata Simathani Marurup Kabupaten Tulungagung. Jurnal Hukum, Administrasi Publik Dan Negara, 2(3), 24–51.

Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (2000). The dynamics of innovation: from National Systems and “Mode 2” to a Triple Helix of university–industry–government relations. Research Policy, 29(2), 109–123.

Fung, A. (2006). Varieties of participation in complex governance. In Public Administration Review (Vol. 66, pp. 66–75). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00667.x

Gray, M. L. (2009). Out in the country: Youth, media, and queer visibility in rural America. books.google.com.

Hasan, R. O., Sahara, L. S., Abidin, J., & Erfinda, Y. (2025). Peran Kolaborasi Pentahelix dalam Pengembangan Destinasi Wisata Desa Mekarbuana Kecamatan Tegalwaru, Kab. Karawang–Jawa Barat. Innovative: Journal Of Social Science Research, 5(2), 919–930.

Hood, C. (1991). A public management for all seasons? Public Administration, 69(1), 3–19.

Lincoln, Y. S. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry (Vol. 75). Sage.

M. Zaenul Muttaqin, Made Selly Dwi Suryanti, R. R. (2023). Entertaining Development from Downstream: Village-Owned Enterprises, Women’s Empowerment, and Information Technology in Binor Probolinggo Village and Pujon Kidul Village, Indonesia. In S. L. Boateng & R. Boateng (Eds.), Empowering Women in the Digital Economy (1st ed., p. 178). Productivity Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003302346

Osborne, S. P. (2006). The new public governance? In Public Management Review (Vol. 8, Issue 3, pp. 377–387). https://doi.org/10.1080/14719030600853022

Ostrom, E. (2007). A diagnostic approach for going beyond panaceas. In Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America (Vol. 104, Issue 39, pp. 15181–15187). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0702288104

Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.

Phillips, N., Lawrence, T. B., & Hardy, C. (2004). Discourse and institutions. Academy of Management Review, 29(4), 635–652. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2004.14497617

Porter-Wenzlaffs, L. J. (2013). Unfolding multicourse case study: Developing students’ administrative competencies. Nurse Educator, 38(6), 241–245. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.NNE.0000435263.15495.9f

Ramadana, C. B. (2013). Keberadaan Badan Usaha Milik Desa (BUMDES) sebagai Penguatan Ekonomi Desa. neliti.com. https://www.neliti.com/publications/75712/keberadaan-badan-usaha-milik-desa-bumdes-sebagai-penguatan-ekonomi-desa

Rohim, Muttaqin, M. Z., & Asmuni. (2022). Problematika dan Kisah Sukses Pengelolaan Badan Usaha Milik Desa. Deepublish.

Rohim, R., Asmuni, A., & Muttaqin, M. Z. (2021). Multi-sector Collaboration; Success Stories of Tourism Village Development. Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Administrasi Publik: Jurnal Pemikiran Dan Penelitian Administrasi Publik.

Rosardi, R. G. (2020). Model Pentahelix Dalam Pengembangan Pariwisata Berkelanjutan Di Kabupaten Batang, Jawa Tengah. RISTEK: Jurnal Riset, Inovasi Dan Teknologi Kabupaten Batang, 4(2), 7–17.

Salihin, A. (2021). Peran badan usaha milik desa (BUMDes) sebagai upaya pengembangan ekonomi masyarakat desa Pejanggik. Al-Intaj: Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Perbankan Syariah, 7(1), 96–104.

Sidik, F. (2017). Implementasi Kebijakan Badan Usaha Milik Desa (BUM Desa): Unit Usaha, Pendapatan, dan Inefisiensi. Jurnal Ekologi Birokrasi, 5(3), 36–46.

Van de Ven, A. H. (2007). Engaged scholarship: A guide for organizational and social research. Oxford University Press.

Williamson, O. E. (1985). The economic institutions of capitalism. Firms, markets, relational contracting. In Das Summa Summarum des Management: Die 25 wichtigsten Werke für Strategie, Führung und Veränderung (pp. 61–75). Springer.

Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications (Vol. 6). Sage Thousand Oaks, CA.

Issue

Vol. 11 No. 2 (2026): Juli

License

Copyright (c) 2026 Rohim, Imam Sunarto, Veby Rizma Imama

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.