Tarlim Jurnal Pendidikan Agama Islam recognizes that the peer-review process does not end upon publication, as continuous scholarly debate is essential for advancing research in Islamic education. The journal is deeply committed to maintaining the integrity of the academic record and provides a clear mechanism to actively facilitate post-publication discussions and corrections. We strongly encourage readers, educators, and researchers to engage critically with published articles and communicate any substantial academic or ethical concerns to the editorial board.

Mechanism for Submitting Critiques
Readers who identify significant errors, methodological flaws, or ethical breaches in any published manuscript are invited to submit a formal letter to the editor or a commentary article. The editorial team handles all incoming critiques with the utmost seriousness and confidentiality. To ensure fairness and objectivity, the journal strictly utilizes COPE's standardized workflows to systematically respond to whistleblowers when concerns are raised directly. In all cases, the original authors will be promptly notified of the critique and will be given a fair, transparent opportunity to respond to the allegations or academic debates raised against their work.

Correcting the Scholarly Record
If a post-publication discussion or a subsequent editorial investigation confirms that an article contains significant unintentional errors or verifiable ethical misconduct, the journal will take immediate action to amend the scholarly record. Depending entirely on the severity of the issue discovered, the editorial board will transparently issue a formal correction (erratum or corrigendum), publish an expression of concern, or execute a full retraction of the compromised article in strict accordance with the official COPE Retraction Guidelines.